A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery

Daniel H. Shin, Leonard Dalag, Raed A. Azhar, Michael Santomauro, Raj Satkunasivam, Charles Metcalfe, Matthew Dunn, Andre Berger, Hooman Djaladat, Mike Nguyen, Mihir M. Desai, Monish Aron, Inderbir S. Gill, Andrew J. Hung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect<sup>™</sup>; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. Materials and Methods Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. Results We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17%) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3%) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. Conclusion In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-308
Number of pages7
JournalBJU International
Volume116
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Robotics
Mentors
Controlled Environment
Wounds and Injuries
Operative Time
Prostatectomy
Colon
Technology
Kidney
Safety
Mentoring

Keywords

  • mentors
  • minimally invasive
  • robotics
  • telemedicine
  • training techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Shin, D. H., Dalag, L., Azhar, R. A., Santomauro, M., Satkunasivam, R., Metcalfe, C., ... Hung, A. J. (2015). A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU International, 116(2), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12985

A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. / Shin, Daniel H.; Dalag, Leonard; Azhar, Raed A.; Santomauro, Michael; Satkunasivam, Raj; Metcalfe, Charles; Dunn, Matthew; Berger, Andre; Djaladat, Hooman; Nguyen, Mike; Desai, Mihir M.; Aron, Monish; Gill, Inderbir S.; Hung, Andrew J.

In: BJU International, Vol. 116, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. 302-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shin, DH, Dalag, L, Azhar, RA, Santomauro, M, Satkunasivam, R, Metcalfe, C, Dunn, M, Berger, A, Djaladat, H, Nguyen, M, Desai, MM, Aron, M, Gill, IS & Hung, AJ 2015, 'A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery', BJU International, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12985
Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA, Santomauro M, Satkunasivam R, Metcalfe C et al. A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU International. 2015 Aug 1;116(2):302-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12985
Shin, Daniel H. ; Dalag, Leonard ; Azhar, Raed A. ; Santomauro, Michael ; Satkunasivam, Raj ; Metcalfe, Charles ; Dunn, Matthew ; Berger, Andre ; Djaladat, Hooman ; Nguyen, Mike ; Desai, Mihir M. ; Aron, Monish ; Gill, Inderbir S. ; Hung, Andrew J. / A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. In: BJU International. 2015 ; Vol. 116, No. 2. pp. 302-308.
@article{73d9fee9003a4f13af33b5b6df939a68,
title = "A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery",
abstract = "Objective To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect™; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. Materials and Methods Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. Results We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17{\%}) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3{\%}) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. Conclusion In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.",
keywords = "mentors, minimally invasive, robotics, telemedicine, training techniques",
author = "Shin, {Daniel H.} and Leonard Dalag and Azhar, {Raed A.} and Michael Santomauro and Raj Satkunasivam and Charles Metcalfe and Matthew Dunn and Andre Berger and Hooman Djaladat and Mike Nguyen and Desai, {Mihir M.} and Monish Aron and Gill, {Inderbir S.} and Hung, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bju.12985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "302--308",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery

AU - Shin, Daniel H.

AU - Dalag, Leonard

AU - Azhar, Raed A.

AU - Santomauro, Michael

AU - Satkunasivam, Raj

AU - Metcalfe, Charles

AU - Dunn, Matthew

AU - Berger, Andre

AU - Djaladat, Hooman

AU - Nguyen, Mike

AU - Desai, Mihir M.

AU - Aron, Monish

AU - Gill, Inderbir S.

AU - Hung, Andrew J.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Objective To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect™; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. Materials and Methods Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. Results We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17%) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3%) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. Conclusion In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.

AB - Objective To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect™; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. Materials and Methods Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. Results We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17%) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3%) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. Conclusion In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.

KW - mentors

KW - minimally invasive

KW - robotics

KW - telemedicine

KW - training techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937393273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937393273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bju.12985

DO - 10.1111/bju.12985

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 302

EP - 308

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 2

ER -