A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the NATO alliance has suffered from policy disagreements throughout its history, current divisions derive mainly from a shift in US grand strategy associated with the Bush Doctrine, which is based on assumptions of US hegemony, an assertive nationalist approach in relations with other states, including erstwhile allies, and the preemptive/preventive use of force. Although this approach has failed to achieve its objectives, the underpinnings on which it is based are deeply rooted in the American political psyche. Given the different interpretations of the security challenges facing the member states of the NATO alliance system, the deeply imbedded views of uniqueness and hegemony that characterize the American political psyche, and the likely unwillingness of the next generation of US political leaders to revise US policy so fully as to eliminate all aspects of recent US attitudes and behavior, it is highly unlikely that the close institutional relationships that characterized the cold war years will be an important feature of future US relations with European states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-363
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Politics
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

NATO
psyche
hegemony
Cold War
allies
cold war
doctrine
leader
interpretation
history
policy
Europe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush. / Kanet, Roger E.

In: International Politics, Vol. 45, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 348-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5038f717611469a842614653b979ed9,
title = "A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush",
abstract = "Although the NATO alliance has suffered from policy disagreements throughout its history, current divisions derive mainly from a shift in US grand strategy associated with the Bush Doctrine, which is based on assumptions of US hegemony, an assertive nationalist approach in relations with other states, including erstwhile allies, and the preemptive/preventive use of force. Although this approach has failed to achieve its objectives, the underpinnings on which it is based are deeply rooted in the American political psyche. Given the different interpretations of the security challenges facing the member states of the NATO alliance system, the deeply imbedded views of uniqueness and hegemony that characterize the American political psyche, and the likely unwillingness of the next generation of US political leaders to revise US policy so fully as to eliminate all aspects of recent US attitudes and behavior, it is highly unlikely that the close institutional relationships that characterized the cold war years will be an important feature of future US relations with European states.",
author = "Kanet, {Roger E}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1057/ip.2008.7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "348--363",
journal = "International Politics",
issn = "1384-5748",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush

AU - Kanet, Roger E

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Although the NATO alliance has suffered from policy disagreements throughout its history, current divisions derive mainly from a shift in US grand strategy associated with the Bush Doctrine, which is based on assumptions of US hegemony, an assertive nationalist approach in relations with other states, including erstwhile allies, and the preemptive/preventive use of force. Although this approach has failed to achieve its objectives, the underpinnings on which it is based are deeply rooted in the American political psyche. Given the different interpretations of the security challenges facing the member states of the NATO alliance system, the deeply imbedded views of uniqueness and hegemony that characterize the American political psyche, and the likely unwillingness of the next generation of US political leaders to revise US policy so fully as to eliminate all aspects of recent US attitudes and behavior, it is highly unlikely that the close institutional relationships that characterized the cold war years will be an important feature of future US relations with European states.

AB - Although the NATO alliance has suffered from policy disagreements throughout its history, current divisions derive mainly from a shift in US grand strategy associated with the Bush Doctrine, which is based on assumptions of US hegemony, an assertive nationalist approach in relations with other states, including erstwhile allies, and the preemptive/preventive use of force. Although this approach has failed to achieve its objectives, the underpinnings on which it is based are deeply rooted in the American political psyche. Given the different interpretations of the security challenges facing the member states of the NATO alliance system, the deeply imbedded views of uniqueness and hegemony that characterize the American political psyche, and the likely unwillingness of the next generation of US political leaders to revise US policy so fully as to eliminate all aspects of recent US attitudes and behavior, it is highly unlikely that the close institutional relationships that characterized the cold war years will be an important feature of future US relations with European states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149152630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42149152630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/ip.2008.7

DO - 10.1057/ip.2008.7

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 348

EP - 363

JO - International Politics

JF - International Politics

SN - 1384-5748

IS - 3

ER -