A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush

Roger E. Kanet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Although the NATO alliance has suffered from policy disagreements throughout its history, current divisions derive mainly from a shift in US grand strategy associated with the Bush Doctrine, which is based on assumptions of US hegemony, an assertive nationalist approach in relations with other states, including erstwhile allies, and the preemptive/preventive use of force. Although this approach has failed to achieve its objectives, the underpinnings on which it is based are deeply rooted in the American political psyche. Given the different interpretations of the security challenges facing the member states of the NATO alliance system, the deeply imbedded views of uniqueness and hegemony that characterize the American political psyche, and the likely unwillingness of the next generation of US political leaders to revise US policy so fully as to eliminate all aspects of recent US attitudes and behavior, it is highly unlikely that the close institutional relationships that characterized the cold war years will be an important feature of future US relations with European states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-363
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Politics
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'A new US approach to Europe? The transatlantic relationship after bush'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this