A multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose-response evaluation of step-2 guanfacine versus placebo in mild to moderate hypertension

Barry J Materson, Woodrow B. Kessler, Michael H. Alderman, Frank L. Canosa, Frank A. Finnerty, Stephen V. Savran, James I. McMillen, Anthony M. Marlon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Guanfacine, an α-adrenoceptor agonist, may exhibit distinct dose-related curves for efficacy and adverse effects in the step-2 therapy of essential hypertension. To determine the lowest clinically effective safe dose, 462 newly or previously diagnosed subjects were admitted to a 5-week prerandomization phase at 8 centers. Patients were weaned from any current antihypertensive drugs and placed on 25-mg chlorthalidone, daily, in the morning. At the end of the 5-week weaning period, 362 patients with seated diastolic blood pressures (BPs) between 95 and 114 mm Hg qualified for the 12-week postrandomization phase. Subjects were randomized to receive either an indistinguishable placebo or 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 mg of guanfacine. Chlorthalidone was changed to bedtime administration and taken with the study medications. Guanfacine was started at the lowest dose in all subjects and increased (if scheduled, according to the randomization code) to the next higher dose at biweekly intervals. Of the 362 randomized patients, 278 completed the study. The 1-mg guanfacine dosage produced a 14/13 mm Hg decrease in BP (p <0.0125 compared with placebo). Doses of guanfacine at 2 and 3 mg/day were not more effective than the 1 mg/day dose; 0.5 mg/day was not better than placebo. There was an increase in the frequency of side effects possibly or probably associated with 2 and 3 mg/day guanfacine. Only 3.2% of the patients in the 1 mg/day group dropped out of the study because of side effects. We conclude that when added to a diuretic, 1 mg/day guanfacine at bedtime is the lowest safe and therapeutically effective dose.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe American journal of cardiology
Volume57
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 28 1986

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Materson, B. J., Kessler, W. B., Alderman, M. H., Canosa, F. L., Finnerty, F. A., Savran, S. V., McMillen, J. I., & Marlon, A. M. (1986). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose-response evaluation of step-2 guanfacine versus placebo in mild to moderate hypertension. The American journal of cardiology, 57(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(86)90721-6