A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties

Amanda P. Goodwin, Soyeon Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study synthesizes 79 standardized mean-change differences between control and treatment groups from 17 independent studies, investigating the effect of morphological interventions on literacy outcomes for students with literacy difficulties. Average total sample size ranged from 15 to 261 from a wide range of grade levels. Overall, morphological instruction showed a significant improvement on literacy achievement (d̄ = 0. 33). Specifically, its effect was significant on several literacy outcomes such as phonological awareness (d̄ = 0. 49), morphological awareness (d̄ = 0. 40), vocabulary (d̄ = 0. 40), reading comprehension (d̄ = 0. 24), and spelling (d̄ = 0. 20). Morphological instruction was particularly effective for children with reading, learning, or speech and language disabilities, English language learners, and struggling readers, suggesting the possibility that morphological instruction can remediate phonological processing challenges. Other moderators were also explored to explain differences in morphological intervention effects. These findings suggest students with literacy difficulties would benefit from morphological instruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-208
Number of pages26
JournalAnnals of Dyslexia
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
literacy
instruction
Reading
Language
Students
Vocabulary
moderator
Sample Size
English language
vocabulary
comprehension
student
school grade
disability
Literacy
Learning
Control Groups
language
learning

Keywords

  • Learning disabilities
  • Literacy achievement
  • Morphological intervention
  • Reading disabilities
  • Reading instruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Education

Cite this

A meta-analysis of morphological interventions : Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. / Goodwin, Amanda P.; Ahn, Soyeon.

In: Annals of Dyslexia, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.12.2010, p. 183-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{488bdcb2af654bcb9d5dd5e881b23de6,
title = "A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties",
abstract = "This study synthesizes 79 standardized mean-change differences between control and treatment groups from 17 independent studies, investigating the effect of morphological interventions on literacy outcomes for students with literacy difficulties. Average total sample size ranged from 15 to 261 from a wide range of grade levels. Overall, morphological instruction showed a significant improvement on literacy achievement (d̄ = 0. 33). Specifically, its effect was significant on several literacy outcomes such as phonological awareness (d̄ = 0. 49), morphological awareness (d̄ = 0. 40), vocabulary (d̄ = 0. 40), reading comprehension (d̄ = 0. 24), and spelling (d̄ = 0. 20). Morphological instruction was particularly effective for children with reading, learning, or speech and language disabilities, English language learners, and struggling readers, suggesting the possibility that morphological instruction can remediate phonological processing challenges. Other moderators were also explored to explain differences in morphological intervention effects. These findings suggest students with literacy difficulties would benefit from morphological instruction.",
keywords = "Learning disabilities, Literacy achievement, Morphological intervention, Reading disabilities, Reading instruction",
author = "Goodwin, {Amanda P.} and Soyeon Ahn",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "183--208",
journal = "Annals of Dyslexia",
issn = "0736-9387",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of morphological interventions

T2 - Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties

AU - Goodwin, Amanda P.

AU - Ahn, Soyeon

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - This study synthesizes 79 standardized mean-change differences between control and treatment groups from 17 independent studies, investigating the effect of morphological interventions on literacy outcomes for students with literacy difficulties. Average total sample size ranged from 15 to 261 from a wide range of grade levels. Overall, morphological instruction showed a significant improvement on literacy achievement (d̄ = 0. 33). Specifically, its effect was significant on several literacy outcomes such as phonological awareness (d̄ = 0. 49), morphological awareness (d̄ = 0. 40), vocabulary (d̄ = 0. 40), reading comprehension (d̄ = 0. 24), and spelling (d̄ = 0. 20). Morphological instruction was particularly effective for children with reading, learning, or speech and language disabilities, English language learners, and struggling readers, suggesting the possibility that morphological instruction can remediate phonological processing challenges. Other moderators were also explored to explain differences in morphological intervention effects. These findings suggest students with literacy difficulties would benefit from morphological instruction.

AB - This study synthesizes 79 standardized mean-change differences between control and treatment groups from 17 independent studies, investigating the effect of morphological interventions on literacy outcomes for students with literacy difficulties. Average total sample size ranged from 15 to 261 from a wide range of grade levels. Overall, morphological instruction showed a significant improvement on literacy achievement (d̄ = 0. 33). Specifically, its effect was significant on several literacy outcomes such as phonological awareness (d̄ = 0. 49), morphological awareness (d̄ = 0. 40), vocabulary (d̄ = 0. 40), reading comprehension (d̄ = 0. 24), and spelling (d̄ = 0. 20). Morphological instruction was particularly effective for children with reading, learning, or speech and language disabilities, English language learners, and struggling readers, suggesting the possibility that morphological instruction can remediate phonological processing challenges. Other moderators were also explored to explain differences in morphological intervention effects. These findings suggest students with literacy difficulties would benefit from morphological instruction.

KW - Learning disabilities

KW - Literacy achievement

KW - Morphological intervention

KW - Reading disabilities

KW - Reading instruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349312359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349312359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x

DO - 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20799003

AN - SCOPUS:78349312359

VL - 60

SP - 183

EP - 208

JO - Annals of Dyslexia

JF - Annals of Dyslexia

SN - 0736-9387

IS - 2

ER -