A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs

David H. Greenberg, Charles Michalopoulos, Philip Robins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study uses meta-analysis to synthesize findings from 31 evaluations of 15 voluntary government-funded training programs for the disadvantaged that operated between 1964 and 1998. On average, the earnings effects of the evaluated programs seem to have been largest for women, quite modest for men, and negligible for youths. For men and women, the earnings effects of training appear to have persisted for at least several years after the training was complete. Classroom skills training was apparently effective in increasing earnings, but basic education was not. There is no evidence that more expensive training programs performed better than less expensive ones. Although the United States has more than three decades of experience in running training programs, the programs do not appear to have become more effective over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-53
Number of pages23
JournalIndustrial and Labor Relations Review
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Education
Government
Training program
Meta-analysis
Evaluation
Skills training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs. / Greenberg, David H.; Michalopoulos, Charles; Robins, Philip.

In: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 31-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, David H. ; Michalopoulos, Charles ; Robins, Philip. / A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs. In: Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 2003 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 31-53.
@article{6aa7e1e6ba124b39809120e5c9f14351,
title = "A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs",
abstract = "This study uses meta-analysis to synthesize findings from 31 evaluations of 15 voluntary government-funded training programs for the disadvantaged that operated between 1964 and 1998. On average, the earnings effects of the evaluated programs seem to have been largest for women, quite modest for men, and negligible for youths. For men and women, the earnings effects of training appear to have persisted for at least several years after the training was complete. Classroom skills training was apparently effective in increasing earnings, but basic education was not. There is no evidence that more expensive training programs performed better than less expensive ones. Although the United States has more than three decades of experience in running training programs, the programs do not appear to have become more effective over time.",
author = "Greenberg, {David H.} and Charles Michalopoulos and Philip Robins",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/001979390305700102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "31--53",
journal = "ILR Review",
issn = "0019-7939",
publisher = "Cornell University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of government-sponsored training programs

AU - Greenberg, David H.

AU - Michalopoulos, Charles

AU - Robins, Philip

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - This study uses meta-analysis to synthesize findings from 31 evaluations of 15 voluntary government-funded training programs for the disadvantaged that operated between 1964 and 1998. On average, the earnings effects of the evaluated programs seem to have been largest for women, quite modest for men, and negligible for youths. For men and women, the earnings effects of training appear to have persisted for at least several years after the training was complete. Classroom skills training was apparently effective in increasing earnings, but basic education was not. There is no evidence that more expensive training programs performed better than less expensive ones. Although the United States has more than three decades of experience in running training programs, the programs do not appear to have become more effective over time.

AB - This study uses meta-analysis to synthesize findings from 31 evaluations of 15 voluntary government-funded training programs for the disadvantaged that operated between 1964 and 1998. On average, the earnings effects of the evaluated programs seem to have been largest for women, quite modest for men, and negligible for youths. For men and women, the earnings effects of training appear to have persisted for at least several years after the training was complete. Classroom skills training was apparently effective in increasing earnings, but basic education was not. There is no evidence that more expensive training programs performed better than less expensive ones. Although the United States has more than three decades of experience in running training programs, the programs do not appear to have become more effective over time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842787345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842787345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001979390305700102

DO - 10.1177/001979390305700102

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 31

EP - 53

JO - ILR Review

JF - ILR Review

SN - 0019-7939

IS - 1

ER -