A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development

Seth S. Haines, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Laurie Balistrieri, Byron Berger, Troy Cook, Don DeAngelis, Holly Doremus, Donald L. Gautier, Tanya Gallegos, Margot Gerritsen, Elisabeth Graffy, Sarah Hawkins, Kathleen M. Johnson, Jordan Macknick, Peter McMahon, Tim Modde, Brenda Pierce, John H. Schuenemeyer, Darius Semmens, Benjamin SimonJason Taylor, Katie Walton-Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natural resource planning at all scales demands methods for assessing the impacts of resource development and use, and in particular it requires standardized methods that yield robust and unbiased results. Building from existing probabilistic methods for assessing the volumes of energy and mineral resources, we provide an algorithm for consistent, reproducible, quantitative assessment of resource development impacts. The approach combines probabilistic input data with Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine probabilistic outputs that convey the uncertainties inherent in the data. For example, one can utilize our algorithm to combine data from a natural gas resource assessment with maps of sage grouse leks and piñon-juniper woodlands in the same area to estimate possible future habitat impacts due to possible future gas development. As another example: one could combine geochemical data and maps of lynx habitat with data from a mineral deposit assessment in the same area to determine possible future mining impacts on water resources and lynx habitat. The approach can be applied to a broad range of positive and negative resource development impacts, such as water quantity or quality, economic benefits, or air quality, limited only by the availability of necessary input data and quantified relationships among geologic resources, development alternatives, and impacts. The framework enables quantitative evaluation of the trade-offs inherent in resource management decision-making, including cumulative impacts, to address societal concerns and policy aspects of resource development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalNatural Resources Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

resource development
energy resource
mineral resource
habitat
resource assessment
mineral deposit
resource use
woodland
natural gas
resource management
air quality
natural resource
water resource
decision making
method
economics
gas

Keywords

  • Energy resources
  • environmental
  • impact assessment
  • integrated assessment
  • mineral resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Haines, S. S., Diffendorfer, J. E., Balistrieri, L., Berger, B., Cook, T., DeAngelis, D., ... Walton-Day, K. (2014). A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development. Natural Resources Research, 23(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-013-9208-6

A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development. / Haines, Seth S.; Diffendorfer, Jay E.; Balistrieri, Laurie; Berger, Byron; Cook, Troy; DeAngelis, Don; Doremus, Holly; Gautier, Donald L.; Gallegos, Tanya; Gerritsen, Margot; Graffy, Elisabeth; Hawkins, Sarah; Johnson, Kathleen M.; Macknick, Jordan; McMahon, Peter; Modde, Tim; Pierce, Brenda; Schuenemeyer, John H.; Semmens, Darius; Simon, Benjamin; Taylor, Jason; Walton-Day, Katie.

In: Natural Resources Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 3-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haines, SS, Diffendorfer, JE, Balistrieri, L, Berger, B, Cook, T, DeAngelis, D, Doremus, H, Gautier, DL, Gallegos, T, Gerritsen, M, Graffy, E, Hawkins, S, Johnson, KM, Macknick, J, McMahon, P, Modde, T, Pierce, B, Schuenemeyer, JH, Semmens, D, Simon, B, Taylor, J & Walton-Day, K 2014, 'A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development', Natural Resources Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-013-9208-6
Haines, Seth S. ; Diffendorfer, Jay E. ; Balistrieri, Laurie ; Berger, Byron ; Cook, Troy ; DeAngelis, Don ; Doremus, Holly ; Gautier, Donald L. ; Gallegos, Tanya ; Gerritsen, Margot ; Graffy, Elisabeth ; Hawkins, Sarah ; Johnson, Kathleen M. ; Macknick, Jordan ; McMahon, Peter ; Modde, Tim ; Pierce, Brenda ; Schuenemeyer, John H. ; Semmens, Darius ; Simon, Benjamin ; Taylor, Jason ; Walton-Day, Katie. / A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development. In: Natural Resources Research. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 3-17.
@article{742afd9768dc48e086fe648f30e307ff,
title = "A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development",
abstract = "Natural resource planning at all scales demands methods for assessing the impacts of resource development and use, and in particular it requires standardized methods that yield robust and unbiased results. Building from existing probabilistic methods for assessing the volumes of energy and mineral resources, we provide an algorithm for consistent, reproducible, quantitative assessment of resource development impacts. The approach combines probabilistic input data with Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine probabilistic outputs that convey the uncertainties inherent in the data. For example, one can utilize our algorithm to combine data from a natural gas resource assessment with maps of sage grouse leks and pi{\~n}on-juniper woodlands in the same area to estimate possible future habitat impacts due to possible future gas development. As another example: one could combine geochemical data and maps of lynx habitat with data from a mineral deposit assessment in the same area to determine possible future mining impacts on water resources and lynx habitat. The approach can be applied to a broad range of positive and negative resource development impacts, such as water quantity or quality, economic benefits, or air quality, limited only by the availability of necessary input data and quantified relationships among geologic resources, development alternatives, and impacts. The framework enables quantitative evaluation of the trade-offs inherent in resource management decision-making, including cumulative impacts, to address societal concerns and policy aspects of resource development.",
keywords = "Energy resources, environmental, impact assessment, integrated assessment, mineral resources",
author = "Haines, {Seth S.} and Diffendorfer, {Jay E.} and Laurie Balistrieri and Byron Berger and Troy Cook and Don DeAngelis and Holly Doremus and Gautier, {Donald L.} and Tanya Gallegos and Margot Gerritsen and Elisabeth Graffy and Sarah Hawkins and Johnson, {Kathleen M.} and Jordan Macknick and Peter McMahon and Tim Modde and Brenda Pierce and Schuenemeyer, {John H.} and Darius Semmens and Benjamin Simon and Jason Taylor and Katie Walton-Day",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11053-013-9208-6",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "3--17",
journal = "Natural Resources Research",
issn = "1520-7439",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Impacts Related to Energy and Mineral Resource Development

AU - Haines, Seth S.

AU - Diffendorfer, Jay E.

AU - Balistrieri, Laurie

AU - Berger, Byron

AU - Cook, Troy

AU - DeAngelis, Don

AU - Doremus, Holly

AU - Gautier, Donald L.

AU - Gallegos, Tanya

AU - Gerritsen, Margot

AU - Graffy, Elisabeth

AU - Hawkins, Sarah

AU - Johnson, Kathleen M.

AU - Macknick, Jordan

AU - McMahon, Peter

AU - Modde, Tim

AU - Pierce, Brenda

AU - Schuenemeyer, John H.

AU - Semmens, Darius

AU - Simon, Benjamin

AU - Taylor, Jason

AU - Walton-Day, Katie

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Natural resource planning at all scales demands methods for assessing the impacts of resource development and use, and in particular it requires standardized methods that yield robust and unbiased results. Building from existing probabilistic methods for assessing the volumes of energy and mineral resources, we provide an algorithm for consistent, reproducible, quantitative assessment of resource development impacts. The approach combines probabilistic input data with Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine probabilistic outputs that convey the uncertainties inherent in the data. For example, one can utilize our algorithm to combine data from a natural gas resource assessment with maps of sage grouse leks and piñon-juniper woodlands in the same area to estimate possible future habitat impacts due to possible future gas development. As another example: one could combine geochemical data and maps of lynx habitat with data from a mineral deposit assessment in the same area to determine possible future mining impacts on water resources and lynx habitat. The approach can be applied to a broad range of positive and negative resource development impacts, such as water quantity or quality, economic benefits, or air quality, limited only by the availability of necessary input data and quantified relationships among geologic resources, development alternatives, and impacts. The framework enables quantitative evaluation of the trade-offs inherent in resource management decision-making, including cumulative impacts, to address societal concerns and policy aspects of resource development.

AB - Natural resource planning at all scales demands methods for assessing the impacts of resource development and use, and in particular it requires standardized methods that yield robust and unbiased results. Building from existing probabilistic methods for assessing the volumes of energy and mineral resources, we provide an algorithm for consistent, reproducible, quantitative assessment of resource development impacts. The approach combines probabilistic input data with Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine probabilistic outputs that convey the uncertainties inherent in the data. For example, one can utilize our algorithm to combine data from a natural gas resource assessment with maps of sage grouse leks and piñon-juniper woodlands in the same area to estimate possible future habitat impacts due to possible future gas development. As another example: one could combine geochemical data and maps of lynx habitat with data from a mineral deposit assessment in the same area to determine possible future mining impacts on water resources and lynx habitat. The approach can be applied to a broad range of positive and negative resource development impacts, such as water quantity or quality, economic benefits, or air quality, limited only by the availability of necessary input data and quantified relationships among geologic resources, development alternatives, and impacts. The framework enables quantitative evaluation of the trade-offs inherent in resource management decision-making, including cumulative impacts, to address societal concerns and policy aspects of resource development.

KW - Energy resources

KW - environmental

KW - impact assessment

KW - integrated assessment

KW - mineral resources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897963935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897963935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11053-013-9208-6

DO - 10.1007/s11053-013-9208-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897963935

VL - 23

SP - 3

EP - 17

JO - Natural Resources Research

JF - Natural Resources Research

SN - 1520-7439

IS - 1

ER -