A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas

T. H. Schreiber, E. R. Podack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cancer immunoediting hypothesis has gained significant footing over the past decade as a result of work performed using sarcomas induced by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA) in mice. Despite the progress made by several groups in establishing evidence for the three phases of immunoediting (elimination, equilibrium and escape), there continues to be active controversy on the nature of interaction between spontaneously formed tumour cells and the immune system during the early phases of tumourigenesis. At the root of this controversy is conflicting and unresolved evidence spanning back to the 1970s regarding the incidence and frequency of 3-MCA-induced sarcomas in immunocompetent mice as compared to immunodeficient mice. In this mini review we provide a critical analysis of both sides of this controversy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-386
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Immunologic Monitoring
Methylcholanthrene
Sarcoma
Neoplasms
Immune System
Incidence

Keywords

  • Immunoediting
  • Immunosurveillance
  • Methylcholanthrene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas. / Schreiber, T. H.; Podack, E. R.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 101, No. 3, 04.08.2009, p. 381-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schreiber, T. H. ; Podack, E. R. / A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2009 ; Vol. 101, No. 3. pp. 381-386.
@article{515e469de7164459a563d1047ab412dd,
title = "A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas",
abstract = "The cancer immunoediting hypothesis has gained significant footing over the past decade as a result of work performed using sarcomas induced by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA) in mice. Despite the progress made by several groups in establishing evidence for the three phases of immunoediting (elimination, equilibrium and escape), there continues to be active controversy on the nature of interaction between spontaneously formed tumour cells and the immune system during the early phases of tumourigenesis. At the root of this controversy is conflicting and unresolved evidence spanning back to the 1970s regarding the incidence and frequency of 3-MCA-induced sarcomas in immunocompetent mice as compared to immunodeficient mice. In this mini review we provide a critical analysis of both sides of this controversy.",
keywords = "Immunoediting, Immunosurveillance, Methylcholanthrene",
author = "Schreiber, {T. H.} and Podack, {E. R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6605198",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "381--386",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas

AU - Schreiber, T. H.

AU - Podack, E. R.

PY - 2009/8/4

Y1 - 2009/8/4

N2 - The cancer immunoediting hypothesis has gained significant footing over the past decade as a result of work performed using sarcomas induced by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA) in mice. Despite the progress made by several groups in establishing evidence for the three phases of immunoediting (elimination, equilibrium and escape), there continues to be active controversy on the nature of interaction between spontaneously formed tumour cells and the immune system during the early phases of tumourigenesis. At the root of this controversy is conflicting and unresolved evidence spanning back to the 1970s regarding the incidence and frequency of 3-MCA-induced sarcomas in immunocompetent mice as compared to immunodeficient mice. In this mini review we provide a critical analysis of both sides of this controversy.

AB - The cancer immunoediting hypothesis has gained significant footing over the past decade as a result of work performed using sarcomas induced by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA) in mice. Despite the progress made by several groups in establishing evidence for the three phases of immunoediting (elimination, equilibrium and escape), there continues to be active controversy on the nature of interaction between spontaneously formed tumour cells and the immune system during the early phases of tumourigenesis. At the root of this controversy is conflicting and unresolved evidence spanning back to the 1970s regarding the incidence and frequency of 3-MCA-induced sarcomas in immunocompetent mice as compared to immunodeficient mice. In this mini review we provide a critical analysis of both sides of this controversy.

KW - Immunoediting

KW - Immunosurveillance

KW - Methylcholanthrene

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68149179581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68149179581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605198

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605198

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 381

EP - 386

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 3

ER -