A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas

T. H. Schreiber, E. R. Podack

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

The cancer immunoediting hypothesis has gained significant footing over the past decade as a result of work performed using sarcomas induced by 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MCA) in mice. Despite the progress made by several groups in establishing evidence for the three phases of immunoediting (elimination, equilibrium and escape), there continues to be active controversy on the nature of interaction between spontaneously formed tumour cells and the immune system during the early phases of tumourigenesis. At the root of this controversy is conflicting and unresolved evidence spanning back to the 1970s regarding the incidence and frequency of 3-MCA-induced sarcomas in immunocompetent mice as compared to immunodeficient mice. In this mini review we provide a critical analysis of both sides of this controversy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-386
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 4 2009

Keywords

  • Immunoediting
  • Immunosurveillance
  • Methylcholanthrene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A critical analysis of the tumour immunosurveillance controversy for 3-MCA-induced sarcomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this