A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height

D. W. Euans, P. D. Connor, R. G. Hahn, M. Rodney Wm., Kristopher Arheart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Uterine fundal height has long been used to assess fetal growth. The common prediction rule states that the distance in centimeters between the pubic symphysis and the top of the fundus equals the gestational age in weeks. The correlation holds best between weeks 18 and 32. This study compares manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Methods. We compared palpated and ultrasound symphysis-fundal height. We then compared both measurements with gestational age as determined by usual ultrasound measurements. Patients were statistically separated by weight into two groups: normal and obese. We hypothesized that manual measurements of fundal height would be affected by obesity and race. Results. Ultrasound fundal height and manual fundal height were equivalent (P≤.01, R2=.92). Regression analysis in normal weight and obese patients showed that both methods have the same predictive power in determining fetal age. Conclusions. Manual measurements are still a reliable and inexpensive means of evaluating the course of pregnancy. Ultrasound is needed when there is a size vs-date discrepancy. Ultrasound is also useful for teaching the measurement of fundal height.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-236
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume40
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gestational Age
Pubic Symphysis
Weights and Measures
Fetal Development
Teaching
Obesity
Regression Analysis
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Euans, D. W., Connor, P. D., Hahn, R. G., Rodney Wm., M., & Arheart, K. (1995). A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Journal of Family Practice, 40(3), 233-236.

A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. / Euans, D. W.; Connor, P. D.; Hahn, R. G.; Rodney Wm., M.; Arheart, Kristopher.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 233-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Euans, DW, Connor, PD, Hahn, RG, Rodney Wm., M & Arheart, K 1995, 'A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height', Journal of Family Practice, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 233-236.
Euans DW, Connor PD, Hahn RG, Rodney Wm. M, Arheart K. A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Journal of Family Practice. 1995 Jan 1;40(3):233-236.
Euans, D. W. ; Connor, P. D. ; Hahn, R. G. ; Rodney Wm., M. ; Arheart, Kristopher. / A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. In: Journal of Family Practice. 1995 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 233-236.
@article{594979c3782d4d2398f2320a66d737e9,
title = "A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height",
abstract = "Background. Uterine fundal height has long been used to assess fetal growth. The common prediction rule states that the distance in centimeters between the pubic symphysis and the top of the fundus equals the gestational age in weeks. The correlation holds best between weeks 18 and 32. This study compares manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Methods. We compared palpated and ultrasound symphysis-fundal height. We then compared both measurements with gestational age as determined by usual ultrasound measurements. Patients were statistically separated by weight into two groups: normal and obese. We hypothesized that manual measurements of fundal height would be affected by obesity and race. Results. Ultrasound fundal height and manual fundal height were equivalent (P≤.01, R2=.92). Regression analysis in normal weight and obese patients showed that both methods have the same predictive power in determining fetal age. Conclusions. Manual measurements are still a reliable and inexpensive means of evaluating the course of pregnancy. Ultrasound is needed when there is a size vs-date discrepancy. Ultrasound is also useful for teaching the measurement of fundal height.",
author = "Euans, {D. W.} and Connor, {P. D.} and Hahn, {R. G.} and {Rodney Wm.}, M. and Kristopher Arheart",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "233--236",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height

AU - Euans, D. W.

AU - Connor, P. D.

AU - Hahn, R. G.

AU - Rodney Wm., M.

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Background. Uterine fundal height has long been used to assess fetal growth. The common prediction rule states that the distance in centimeters between the pubic symphysis and the top of the fundus equals the gestational age in weeks. The correlation holds best between weeks 18 and 32. This study compares manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Methods. We compared palpated and ultrasound symphysis-fundal height. We then compared both measurements with gestational age as determined by usual ultrasound measurements. Patients were statistically separated by weight into two groups: normal and obese. We hypothesized that manual measurements of fundal height would be affected by obesity and race. Results. Ultrasound fundal height and manual fundal height were equivalent (P≤.01, R2=.92). Regression analysis in normal weight and obese patients showed that both methods have the same predictive power in determining fetal age. Conclusions. Manual measurements are still a reliable and inexpensive means of evaluating the course of pregnancy. Ultrasound is needed when there is a size vs-date discrepancy. Ultrasound is also useful for teaching the measurement of fundal height.

AB - Background. Uterine fundal height has long been used to assess fetal growth. The common prediction rule states that the distance in centimeters between the pubic symphysis and the top of the fundus equals the gestational age in weeks. The correlation holds best between weeks 18 and 32. This study compares manual and ultrasound measurements of fundal height. Methods. We compared palpated and ultrasound symphysis-fundal height. We then compared both measurements with gestational age as determined by usual ultrasound measurements. Patients were statistically separated by weight into two groups: normal and obese. We hypothesized that manual measurements of fundal height would be affected by obesity and race. Results. Ultrasound fundal height and manual fundal height were equivalent (P≤.01, R2=.92). Regression analysis in normal weight and obese patients showed that both methods have the same predictive power in determining fetal age. Conclusions. Manual measurements are still a reliable and inexpensive means of evaluating the course of pregnancy. Ultrasound is needed when there is a size vs-date discrepancy. Ultrasound is also useful for teaching the measurement of fundal height.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028926311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028926311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 233

EP - 236

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 3

ER -