A comparison of ensemble-transform Kalman-filter targeting guidance with ECMWF and NRL total-energy singular-vector guidance

Sharanya J Majumdar, C. H. Bishop, R. Buizza, R. Gelaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ongoing adaptive observing programmes strive to improve short- and medium-range forecasts of winter weather over populated areas. Aircraft equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) dropwindsondes are directed over ordinarily data-sparse regions (oceans) to collect observations to enhance the subsequent operational analysis-forecast cycle. Two objective techniques that have been used to identify optimal 'target regions' are the ensemble-transform Kalman filter (ET KF) and the singular-vector technique. The similarities and differences between targeting guidance based on the ET KF and total-energy singular vectors (TESVs) are assessed for ten cases during the North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX). TESVs are computed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) using their respective global models, and the ET KF uses 25 ECMWF ensemble perturbations. Using measures based on (i) rankings of aircraft flight tracks and (ii) spatial similarities between targeting guidance maps, the main finding is that (a) the ET KF guidance is reasonably correlated with TESV guidance for at least seven of the ten NORPEX cases. Other findings include: (b) the ECMWF and NRL TESV targets sometimes differ significantly, (c) the ET KF and TESV guidance maps often display different optimal locations for targeting on smaller scales, but larger-scale aspects are usually similar, (d) the ET KF generally identifies larger regions over which useful observations can be taken compared with the SV technique, and (e) regions that are deemed effective for targeting by both techniques often correspond to baroclinic zones. The ET KF and SV techniques may identify similar regions for targeting if locations of large ensemble-based analysis-error variance coincide with areas where rapid perturbation growth occurs. On the other hand, they may identify different targeting locations for the following two reasons. First, the ET KF implicitly accounts for error correlation length-scales in its predictions of forecast-error variance reduction produced by any set of targeted observations. Hence, it can identify locations for targeted observations that are distant from the regions of high analysis sensitivity that are selected for targeting by the SV technique. Second, ET KF estimates of analysis-error variance are constrained to a subspace of evolved ensemble perturbations and are, therefore, rank deficient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2527-2549
Number of pages23
JournalQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Volume128
Issue number585 PART A
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2002

Fingerprint

Kalman filter
targeting
transform
weather
energy
error analysis
perturbation
aircraft
comparison
laboratory research
forecast
ranking
sensitivity analysis
GPS
experiment
flight
winter
ocean
prediction

Keywords

  • Perturbation growth
  • Signal variance
  • Targeted observations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

A comparison of ensemble-transform Kalman-filter targeting guidance with ECMWF and NRL total-energy singular-vector guidance. / Majumdar, Sharanya J; Bishop, C. H.; Buizza, R.; Gelaro, R.

In: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 128, No. 585 PART A, 10.2002, p. 2527-2549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10f6be768e424aebb12ed418673e4e05,
title = "A comparison of ensemble-transform Kalman-filter targeting guidance with ECMWF and NRL total-energy singular-vector guidance",
abstract = "Ongoing adaptive observing programmes strive to improve short- and medium-range forecasts of winter weather over populated areas. Aircraft equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) dropwindsondes are directed over ordinarily data-sparse regions (oceans) to collect observations to enhance the subsequent operational analysis-forecast cycle. Two objective techniques that have been used to identify optimal 'target regions' are the ensemble-transform Kalman filter (ET KF) and the singular-vector technique. The similarities and differences between targeting guidance based on the ET KF and total-energy singular vectors (TESVs) are assessed for ten cases during the North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX). TESVs are computed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) using their respective global models, and the ET KF uses 25 ECMWF ensemble perturbations. Using measures based on (i) rankings of aircraft flight tracks and (ii) spatial similarities between targeting guidance maps, the main finding is that (a) the ET KF guidance is reasonably correlated with TESV guidance for at least seven of the ten NORPEX cases. Other findings include: (b) the ECMWF and NRL TESV targets sometimes differ significantly, (c) the ET KF and TESV guidance maps often display different optimal locations for targeting on smaller scales, but larger-scale aspects are usually similar, (d) the ET KF generally identifies larger regions over which useful observations can be taken compared with the SV technique, and (e) regions that are deemed effective for targeting by both techniques often correspond to baroclinic zones. The ET KF and SV techniques may identify similar regions for targeting if locations of large ensemble-based analysis-error variance coincide with areas where rapid perturbation growth occurs. On the other hand, they may identify different targeting locations for the following two reasons. First, the ET KF implicitly accounts for error correlation length-scales in its predictions of forecast-error variance reduction produced by any set of targeted observations. Hence, it can identify locations for targeted observations that are distant from the regions of high analysis sensitivity that are selected for targeting by the SV technique. Second, ET KF estimates of analysis-error variance are constrained to a subspace of evolved ensemble perturbations and are, therefore, rank deficient.",
keywords = "Perturbation growth, Signal variance, Targeted observations",
author = "Majumdar, {Sharanya J} and Bishop, {C. H.} and R. Buizza and R. Gelaro",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1256/qj.01.214",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "2527--2549",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society",
issn = "0035-9009",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "585 PART A",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of ensemble-transform Kalman-filter targeting guidance with ECMWF and NRL total-energy singular-vector guidance

AU - Majumdar, Sharanya J

AU - Bishop, C. H.

AU - Buizza, R.

AU - Gelaro, R.

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - Ongoing adaptive observing programmes strive to improve short- and medium-range forecasts of winter weather over populated areas. Aircraft equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) dropwindsondes are directed over ordinarily data-sparse regions (oceans) to collect observations to enhance the subsequent operational analysis-forecast cycle. Two objective techniques that have been used to identify optimal 'target regions' are the ensemble-transform Kalman filter (ET KF) and the singular-vector technique. The similarities and differences between targeting guidance based on the ET KF and total-energy singular vectors (TESVs) are assessed for ten cases during the North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX). TESVs are computed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) using their respective global models, and the ET KF uses 25 ECMWF ensemble perturbations. Using measures based on (i) rankings of aircraft flight tracks and (ii) spatial similarities between targeting guidance maps, the main finding is that (a) the ET KF guidance is reasonably correlated with TESV guidance for at least seven of the ten NORPEX cases. Other findings include: (b) the ECMWF and NRL TESV targets sometimes differ significantly, (c) the ET KF and TESV guidance maps often display different optimal locations for targeting on smaller scales, but larger-scale aspects are usually similar, (d) the ET KF generally identifies larger regions over which useful observations can be taken compared with the SV technique, and (e) regions that are deemed effective for targeting by both techniques often correspond to baroclinic zones. The ET KF and SV techniques may identify similar regions for targeting if locations of large ensemble-based analysis-error variance coincide with areas where rapid perturbation growth occurs. On the other hand, they may identify different targeting locations for the following two reasons. First, the ET KF implicitly accounts for error correlation length-scales in its predictions of forecast-error variance reduction produced by any set of targeted observations. Hence, it can identify locations for targeted observations that are distant from the regions of high analysis sensitivity that are selected for targeting by the SV technique. Second, ET KF estimates of analysis-error variance are constrained to a subspace of evolved ensemble perturbations and are, therefore, rank deficient.

AB - Ongoing adaptive observing programmes strive to improve short- and medium-range forecasts of winter weather over populated areas. Aircraft equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) dropwindsondes are directed over ordinarily data-sparse regions (oceans) to collect observations to enhance the subsequent operational analysis-forecast cycle. Two objective techniques that have been used to identify optimal 'target regions' are the ensemble-transform Kalman filter (ET KF) and the singular-vector technique. The similarities and differences between targeting guidance based on the ET KF and total-energy singular vectors (TESVs) are assessed for ten cases during the North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX). TESVs are computed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) using their respective global models, and the ET KF uses 25 ECMWF ensemble perturbations. Using measures based on (i) rankings of aircraft flight tracks and (ii) spatial similarities between targeting guidance maps, the main finding is that (a) the ET KF guidance is reasonably correlated with TESV guidance for at least seven of the ten NORPEX cases. Other findings include: (b) the ECMWF and NRL TESV targets sometimes differ significantly, (c) the ET KF and TESV guidance maps often display different optimal locations for targeting on smaller scales, but larger-scale aspects are usually similar, (d) the ET KF generally identifies larger regions over which useful observations can be taken compared with the SV technique, and (e) regions that are deemed effective for targeting by both techniques often correspond to baroclinic zones. The ET KF and SV techniques may identify similar regions for targeting if locations of large ensemble-based analysis-error variance coincide with areas where rapid perturbation growth occurs. On the other hand, they may identify different targeting locations for the following two reasons. First, the ET KF implicitly accounts for error correlation length-scales in its predictions of forecast-error variance reduction produced by any set of targeted observations. Hence, it can identify locations for targeted observations that are distant from the regions of high analysis sensitivity that are selected for targeting by the SV technique. Second, ET KF estimates of analysis-error variance are constrained to a subspace of evolved ensemble perturbations and are, therefore, rank deficient.

KW - Perturbation growth

KW - Signal variance

KW - Targeted observations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036774083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036774083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1256/qj.01.214

DO - 10.1256/qj.01.214

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036774083

VL - 128

SP - 2527

EP - 2549

JO - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

JF - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

SN - 0035-9009

IS - 585 PART A

ER -