A comparison of acute hospital charges after tubular versus open microdiskectomy

Kevin S. Cahill, Allan D Levi, Matthew D. Cummock, Wensheng Liao, Michael Y. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if tubular microdiskectomy is associated with differences in hospital charges compared with open microdiskectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent tubular microdiskectomy or open microdiskectomy performed by the senior authors from 2007-2010 was performed. The primary outcome was inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for each procedure using itemized charge data obtained from the hospital finance department. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, and operative times. Results: There were 76 eligible patients (33 open microdiskectomy and 48 tubular microdiskectomy) identified during the study period. The mean total charge was $27,811 (standard deviation $11,198) in the open group compared with $22,358 (standard deviation $8695) in the tubular group. Total charges in the tubular group were on average $5453 less than in the open group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in operative times or complications. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the tubular group (mean 1.5 days open vs. 0.9 days tubular, P = 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis revealed significantly lower acute hospital charges associated with tubular microdiskectomy versus open microdiskectomy at an academic tertiary care hospital. These differences appear to the related to decreased use of postoperative resources in the tubular group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-212
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume80
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hospital Charges
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Hospital Departments
Economic Inflation
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Hospital charges
  • Lumbar disk herniation
  • Minimally invasive spine surgery
  • Tubular microdiskectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

A comparison of acute hospital charges after tubular versus open microdiskectomy. / Cahill, Kevin S.; Levi, Allan D; Cummock, Matthew D.; Liao, Wensheng; Wang, Michael Y.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 80, No. 1-2, 01.07.2013, p. 208-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cahill, Kevin S. ; Levi, Allan D ; Cummock, Matthew D. ; Liao, Wensheng ; Wang, Michael Y. / A comparison of acute hospital charges after tubular versus open microdiskectomy. In: World Neurosurgery. 2013 ; Vol. 80, No. 1-2. pp. 208-212.
@article{b430e07cab0d42699d4f3179484042a8,
title = "A comparison of acute hospital charges after tubular versus open microdiskectomy",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if tubular microdiskectomy is associated with differences in hospital charges compared with open microdiskectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent tubular microdiskectomy or open microdiskectomy performed by the senior authors from 2007-2010 was performed. The primary outcome was inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for each procedure using itemized charge data obtained from the hospital finance department. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, and operative times. Results: There were 76 eligible patients (33 open microdiskectomy and 48 tubular microdiskectomy) identified during the study period. The mean total charge was $27,811 (standard deviation $11,198) in the open group compared with $22,358 (standard deviation $8695) in the tubular group. Total charges in the tubular group were on average $5453 less than in the open group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in operative times or complications. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the tubular group (mean 1.5 days open vs. 0.9 days tubular, P = 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis revealed significantly lower acute hospital charges associated with tubular microdiskectomy versus open microdiskectomy at an academic tertiary care hospital. These differences appear to the related to decreased use of postoperative resources in the tubular group.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness analysis, Hospital charges, Lumbar disk herniation, Minimally invasive spine surgery, Tubular microdiskectomy",
author = "Cahill, {Kevin S.} and Levi, {Allan D} and Cummock, {Matthew D.} and Wensheng Liao and Wang, {Michael Y.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "208--212",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of acute hospital charges after tubular versus open microdiskectomy

AU - Cahill, Kevin S.

AU - Levi, Allan D

AU - Cummock, Matthew D.

AU - Liao, Wensheng

AU - Wang, Michael Y.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Objective: To determine if tubular microdiskectomy is associated with differences in hospital charges compared with open microdiskectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent tubular microdiskectomy or open microdiskectomy performed by the senior authors from 2007-2010 was performed. The primary outcome was inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for each procedure using itemized charge data obtained from the hospital finance department. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, and operative times. Results: There were 76 eligible patients (33 open microdiskectomy and 48 tubular microdiskectomy) identified during the study period. The mean total charge was $27,811 (standard deviation $11,198) in the open group compared with $22,358 (standard deviation $8695) in the tubular group. Total charges in the tubular group were on average $5453 less than in the open group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in operative times or complications. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the tubular group (mean 1.5 days open vs. 0.9 days tubular, P = 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis revealed significantly lower acute hospital charges associated with tubular microdiskectomy versus open microdiskectomy at an academic tertiary care hospital. These differences appear to the related to decreased use of postoperative resources in the tubular group.

AB - Objective: To determine if tubular microdiskectomy is associated with differences in hospital charges compared with open microdiskectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent tubular microdiskectomy or open microdiskectomy performed by the senior authors from 2007-2010 was performed. The primary outcome was inflation-adjusted total hospital charges for each procedure using itemized charge data obtained from the hospital finance department. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, complications, and operative times. Results: There were 76 eligible patients (33 open microdiskectomy and 48 tubular microdiskectomy) identified during the study period. The mean total charge was $27,811 (standard deviation $11,198) in the open group compared with $22,358 (standard deviation $8695) in the tubular group. Total charges in the tubular group were on average $5453 less than in the open group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in operative times or complications. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the tubular group (mean 1.5 days open vs. 0.9 days tubular, P = 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis revealed significantly lower acute hospital charges associated with tubular microdiskectomy versus open microdiskectomy at an academic tertiary care hospital. These differences appear to the related to decreased use of postoperative resources in the tubular group.

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Hospital charges

KW - Lumbar disk herniation

KW - Minimally invasive spine surgery

KW - Tubular microdiskectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883823061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883823061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 23022652

AN - SCOPUS:84883823061

VL - 80

SP - 208

EP - 212

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 1-2

ER -