A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era

Leonardo Tamariz, Fred J. Hendler, John M. Wells, Annette Anderson, Stephen Bartlett

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


With the rapid spread of SARS-CoV2 has come a rapid proliferation of clinical research studies, resulting in considerable strain on research ethics committees (RECS), which need to review study proposals. RECs are pressured to move through the review process quickly so that studies can get underway to address the pandemic. These committees are also asked to increase efficiency without relaxing the standards for ethical review. RECs are accustomed to external pressure for approval from investigators; however, in the Covid-19 era, this pressure is coming from not only the sponsors and investigators but also many other stakeholders, including world leaders, the community, the media, and professional organizations. Drawing on the authors' experiences on a central REC reviewing complex multicenter Covid-19 studies, this commentary describes challenges that are inherent to Covid-19 research studies, such as the difficulty of obtaining informed consent from patients ill with the highly infectious virus. The commentary recommends several steps that RECs can take to ensure ethical review of research studies during the Covid-19 pandemic and future infectious disease outbreaks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-44
Number of pages3
JournalEthics & human research
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 2021
Externally publishedYes


  • Covid-19 pandemic
  • SARS-CoV2
  • human research ethics
  • informed consent
  • institutional review boards (IRBs)
  • public health emergencies
  • research ethics committees (RECs)
  • scientific validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)


Dive into the research topics of 'A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this