A Brochure to Improve Understanding of Incomplete Mammogram Results among Black Women at a Public Hospital in Miami, Florida

Erin N Marcus, Lee M. Sanders, Beth A. Jones, Tulay Koru-Sengul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives Black women are at increased risk of being called back for additional studies after a screening mammogram. With focus group input, we developed a brochure to improve awareness of the frequency of abnormal results. This study explored the brochure's acceptability and effect on understanding risk and breast cancer fears among black mammography patients at an urban safety-net breast imaging center in Miami, Florida. Methods A randomized controlled trial of the brochure (plus the standard result notification letter) versus usual care (standard notification letter alone). Black English-speaking women with an incomplete mammography result were randomized to the intervention or control group. Consenting participants completed a telephone questionnaire. Outcomes included awareness of result, anxiety level, and brochure acceptability. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was used and a univariate logistic regression was performed for intervention and control odds ratios. Results A total of 106 women were randomly selected to receive the brochure plus the letter or the letter alone. One chose to opt out; a minimum of three attempts were made to reach each of the remaining 105 women by telephone. Verbal communication was established with 59 of the randomized women, and 51 of those women agreed to participate in a survey to evaluate the brochure. There was no significant difference between the surveyed groups in knowledge of the result and follow-up plan. Surveyed intervention subjects were more likely to agree that "it is very common for women to have to follow up after a mammogram" (odds ratio [OR] 25.91, P = 0.029) and less likely to agree with the statement "getting a follow-up mammogram is scary" (OR 0.24, P = 0.021). Most intervention subjects said the pamphlet helped them understand their result "a lot" (79%, 19) and viewed it as "extremely" or "mostly" clear (96%, 23). Intervention subjects also voiced greater awareness of a telephone number they could call for more information about cancer (OR 11.38, P = 0.029). Conclusions A culturally tailored brochure explaining the frequency of abnormal mammograms was well received by women at a large safety-net health system. Pilot testing suggests that it may improve patient perception of risk and awareness of informational resources. This strategy should be considered to enhance result communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume112
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pamphlets
Public Hospitals
Odds Ratio
Telephone
Mammography
Communication
Safety
Standard of Care
Focus Groups
Fear
Breast
Anxiety
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Breast Neoplasms
Control Groups
Health

Keywords

  • breast cancer screening
  • health communication
  • mammography
  • risk communication
  • women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A Brochure to Improve Understanding of Incomplete Mammogram Results among Black Women at a Public Hospital in Miami, Florida. / Marcus, Erin N; Sanders, Lee M.; Jones, Beth A.; Koru-Sengul, Tulay.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 112, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23d158ccd23d4fc7a2b88797f5c7ba1f,
title = "A Brochure to Improve Understanding of Incomplete Mammogram Results among Black Women at a Public Hospital in Miami, Florida",
abstract = "Objectives Black women are at increased risk of being called back for additional studies after a screening mammogram. With focus group input, we developed a brochure to improve awareness of the frequency of abnormal results. This study explored the brochure's acceptability and effect on understanding risk and breast cancer fears among black mammography patients at an urban safety-net breast imaging center in Miami, Florida. Methods A randomized controlled trial of the brochure (plus the standard result notification letter) versus usual care (standard notification letter alone). Black English-speaking women with an incomplete mammography result were randomized to the intervention or control group. Consenting participants completed a telephone questionnaire. Outcomes included awareness of result, anxiety level, and brochure acceptability. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was used and a univariate logistic regression was performed for intervention and control odds ratios. Results A total of 106 women were randomly selected to receive the brochure plus the letter or the letter alone. One chose to opt out; a minimum of three attempts were made to reach each of the remaining 105 women by telephone. Verbal communication was established with 59 of the randomized women, and 51 of those women agreed to participate in a survey to evaluate the brochure. There was no significant difference between the surveyed groups in knowledge of the result and follow-up plan. Surveyed intervention subjects were more likely to agree that {"}it is very common for women to have to follow up after a mammogram{"} (odds ratio [OR] 25.91, P = 0.029) and less likely to agree with the statement {"}getting a follow-up mammogram is scary{"} (OR 0.24, P = 0.021). Most intervention subjects said the pamphlet helped them understand their result {"}a lot{"} (79{\%}, 19) and viewed it as {"}extremely{"} or {"}mostly{"} clear (96{\%}, 23). Intervention subjects also voiced greater awareness of a telephone number they could call for more information about cancer (OR 11.38, P = 0.029). Conclusions A culturally tailored brochure explaining the frequency of abnormal mammograms was well received by women at a large safety-net health system. Pilot testing suggests that it may improve patient perception of risk and awareness of informational resources. This strategy should be considered to enhance result communication.",
keywords = "breast cancer screening, health communication, mammography, risk communication, women's health",
author = "Marcus, {Erin N} and Sanders, {Lee M.} and Jones, {Beth A.} and Tulay Koru-Sengul",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000919",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Brochure to Improve Understanding of Incomplete Mammogram Results among Black Women at a Public Hospital in Miami, Florida

AU - Marcus, Erin N

AU - Sanders, Lee M.

AU - Jones, Beth A.

AU - Koru-Sengul, Tulay

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives Black women are at increased risk of being called back for additional studies after a screening mammogram. With focus group input, we developed a brochure to improve awareness of the frequency of abnormal results. This study explored the brochure's acceptability and effect on understanding risk and breast cancer fears among black mammography patients at an urban safety-net breast imaging center in Miami, Florida. Methods A randomized controlled trial of the brochure (plus the standard result notification letter) versus usual care (standard notification letter alone). Black English-speaking women with an incomplete mammography result were randomized to the intervention or control group. Consenting participants completed a telephone questionnaire. Outcomes included awareness of result, anxiety level, and brochure acceptability. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was used and a univariate logistic regression was performed for intervention and control odds ratios. Results A total of 106 women were randomly selected to receive the brochure plus the letter or the letter alone. One chose to opt out; a minimum of three attempts were made to reach each of the remaining 105 women by telephone. Verbal communication was established with 59 of the randomized women, and 51 of those women agreed to participate in a survey to evaluate the brochure. There was no significant difference between the surveyed groups in knowledge of the result and follow-up plan. Surveyed intervention subjects were more likely to agree that "it is very common for women to have to follow up after a mammogram" (odds ratio [OR] 25.91, P = 0.029) and less likely to agree with the statement "getting a follow-up mammogram is scary" (OR 0.24, P = 0.021). Most intervention subjects said the pamphlet helped them understand their result "a lot" (79%, 19) and viewed it as "extremely" or "mostly" clear (96%, 23). Intervention subjects also voiced greater awareness of a telephone number they could call for more information about cancer (OR 11.38, P = 0.029). Conclusions A culturally tailored brochure explaining the frequency of abnormal mammograms was well received by women at a large safety-net health system. Pilot testing suggests that it may improve patient perception of risk and awareness of informational resources. This strategy should be considered to enhance result communication.

AB - Objectives Black women are at increased risk of being called back for additional studies after a screening mammogram. With focus group input, we developed a brochure to improve awareness of the frequency of abnormal results. This study explored the brochure's acceptability and effect on understanding risk and breast cancer fears among black mammography patients at an urban safety-net breast imaging center in Miami, Florida. Methods A randomized controlled trial of the brochure (plus the standard result notification letter) versus usual care (standard notification letter alone). Black English-speaking women with an incomplete mammography result were randomized to the intervention or control group. Consenting participants completed a telephone questionnaire. Outcomes included awareness of result, anxiety level, and brochure acceptability. The χ2 or Fisher exact test was used and a univariate logistic regression was performed for intervention and control odds ratios. Results A total of 106 women were randomly selected to receive the brochure plus the letter or the letter alone. One chose to opt out; a minimum of three attempts were made to reach each of the remaining 105 women by telephone. Verbal communication was established with 59 of the randomized women, and 51 of those women agreed to participate in a survey to evaluate the brochure. There was no significant difference between the surveyed groups in knowledge of the result and follow-up plan. Surveyed intervention subjects were more likely to agree that "it is very common for women to have to follow up after a mammogram" (odds ratio [OR] 25.91, P = 0.029) and less likely to agree with the statement "getting a follow-up mammogram is scary" (OR 0.24, P = 0.021). Most intervention subjects said the pamphlet helped them understand their result "a lot" (79%, 19) and viewed it as "extremely" or "mostly" clear (96%, 23). Intervention subjects also voiced greater awareness of a telephone number they could call for more information about cancer (OR 11.38, P = 0.029). Conclusions A culturally tailored brochure explaining the frequency of abnormal mammograms was well received by women at a large safety-net health system. Pilot testing suggests that it may improve patient perception of risk and awareness of informational resources. This strategy should be considered to enhance result communication.

KW - breast cancer screening

KW - health communication

KW - mammography

KW - risk communication

KW - women's health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059466614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059466614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000919

DO - 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000919

M3 - Article

C2 - 30608622

AN - SCOPUS:85059466614

VL - 112

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 1

ER -