A bold strategy is not always optimal in the presence of inflation

Robert W. Chen, Larry A. Shepp, Alan Zame

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A gambler, with an initial fortune less than 1, wants to buy a house which sells today for 1. Due to inflation, the price of the house tomorrow will be 1 + α, where a is a nonnegative constant, and will continue to go up at this rate, becoming (1 + α) n on the nth day. Once each day, he can stake any amount of fortune in his possession, but no more than he possesses, on a primitive casino. It is well known that, in a subfair primitive casino without the presence of inflation, the gambler should play boldly. The presence of inflation would motivate the gambler to recognize the time value of his fortune and to try to reach his goal as quickly as possible; intuitively, we would conjecture that the gambler should again play boldly. However, in this note we will show that, unexpectedly, bold play is not necessarily optimal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-592
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Probability
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2004

Fingerprint

Inflation
Continue
Non-negative
Strategy
Casino
Value of time

Keywords

  • Bold strategy
  • Gambling problem
  • Optimal strategy
  • Primitive casino

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Mathematics(all)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

A bold strategy is not always optimal in the presence of inflation. / Chen, Robert W.; Shepp, Larry A.; Zame, Alan.

In: Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.06.2004, p. 587-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Robert W. ; Shepp, Larry A. ; Zame, Alan. / A bold strategy is not always optimal in the presence of inflation. In: Journal of Applied Probability. 2004 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 587-592.
@article{0056de65a5974fcb8b35aa2210c50dcd,
title = "A bold strategy is not always optimal in the presence of inflation",
abstract = "A gambler, with an initial fortune less than 1, wants to buy a house which sells today for 1. Due to inflation, the price of the house tomorrow will be 1 + α, where a is a nonnegative constant, and will continue to go up at this rate, becoming (1 + α) n on the nth day. Once each day, he can stake any amount of fortune in his possession, but no more than he possesses, on a primitive casino. It is well known that, in a subfair primitive casino without the presence of inflation, the gambler should play boldly. The presence of inflation would motivate the gambler to recognize the time value of his fortune and to try to reach his goal as quickly as possible; intuitively, we would conjecture that the gambler should again play boldly. However, in this note we will show that, unexpectedly, bold play is not necessarily optimal.",
keywords = "Bold strategy, Gambling problem, Optimal strategy, Primitive casino",
author = "Chen, {Robert W.} and Shepp, {Larry A.} and Alan Zame",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1239/jap/1082999089",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "587--592",
journal = "Journal of Applied Probability",
issn = "0021-9002",
publisher = "University of Sheffield",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A bold strategy is not always optimal in the presence of inflation

AU - Chen, Robert W.

AU - Shepp, Larry A.

AU - Zame, Alan

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - A gambler, with an initial fortune less than 1, wants to buy a house which sells today for 1. Due to inflation, the price of the house tomorrow will be 1 + α, where a is a nonnegative constant, and will continue to go up at this rate, becoming (1 + α) n on the nth day. Once each day, he can stake any amount of fortune in his possession, but no more than he possesses, on a primitive casino. It is well known that, in a subfair primitive casino without the presence of inflation, the gambler should play boldly. The presence of inflation would motivate the gambler to recognize the time value of his fortune and to try to reach his goal as quickly as possible; intuitively, we would conjecture that the gambler should again play boldly. However, in this note we will show that, unexpectedly, bold play is not necessarily optimal.

AB - A gambler, with an initial fortune less than 1, wants to buy a house which sells today for 1. Due to inflation, the price of the house tomorrow will be 1 + α, where a is a nonnegative constant, and will continue to go up at this rate, becoming (1 + α) n on the nth day. Once each day, he can stake any amount of fortune in his possession, but no more than he possesses, on a primitive casino. It is well known that, in a subfair primitive casino without the presence of inflation, the gambler should play boldly. The presence of inflation would motivate the gambler to recognize the time value of his fortune and to try to reach his goal as quickly as possible; intuitively, we would conjecture that the gambler should again play boldly. However, in this note we will show that, unexpectedly, bold play is not necessarily optimal.

KW - Bold strategy

KW - Gambling problem

KW - Optimal strategy

KW - Primitive casino

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242756620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242756620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1239/jap/1082999089

DO - 10.1239/jap/1082999089

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3242756620

VL - 41

SP - 587

EP - 592

JO - Journal of Applied Probability

JF - Journal of Applied Probability

SN - 0021-9002

IS - 2

ER -