A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

Christopher Anderson, Ryan Weber, Darshan Patel, William Lowrance, Adam Mellis, Michael Cookson, Maximilian Lang, Daniel Barocas, Sam Chang, Elizabeth Newberger, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, Alon Z. Weizer, Cheryl T. Lee, Bruce Kava, Max Jackson, Anoop Meraney, Daniel Sjoberg, Bernard Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, Machele DonatHarry Herr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Previous studies have demonstrated significant variation in recurrence rates after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, likely due to differences in surgical quality. We sought to create a framework to define, measure and improve the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using a surgical checklist. Materials and Methods We formed a multi-institutional group of urologists with expertise with bladder cancer and identified 10 critical items that should be performed during every high quality transurethral bladder tumor resection. We prospectively implemented a 10-item checklist into practice and reviewed the operative reports of such resections performed before and after implementation. Results at all institutions were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the overall change in the mean number of items documented. Results The operative notes for 325 transurethral bladder tumor resections during checklist use were compared to those for 428 performed before checklist implementation. Checklist use increased the mean number of items reported from 4.8 to 8.0 per resection, resulting in a mean increase of 3.3 items (95% CI 1.9–4.7) on meta-analysis. With the checklist the percentage of reports that included all 10 items increased from 0.5% to 27% (p <0.0001). Surgeons who reported more checklist items tended to have a slightly higher proportion of biopsies containing muscle, although not at conventional significance (p = 0.062). Conclusions The use of a 10-item checklist during transurethral resection of bladder tumor improved the reporting of critical procedural elements. Although there was no clear impact on the inclusion of muscle in the specimen, checklist use may enhance surgeon attention to important aspects of the procedure and be a lever for quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1014-1020
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume196
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Checklist
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Meta-Analysis
Muscles
Quality Improvement
Biopsy
Recurrence

Keywords

  • checklist
  • quality improvement
  • surgeons
  • urinary bladder neoplasms
  • urologic surgical procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Anderson, C., Weber, R., Patel, D., Lowrance, W., Mellis, A., Cookson, M., ... Herr, H. (2016). A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. Journal of Urology, 196(4), 1014-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151

A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. / Anderson, Christopher; Weber, Ryan; Patel, Darshan; Lowrance, William; Mellis, Adam; Cookson, Michael; Lang, Maximilian; Barocas, Daniel; Chang, Sam; Newberger, Elizabeth; Montgomery, Jeffrey S.; Weizer, Alon Z.; Lee, Cheryl T.; Kava, Bruce; Jackson, Max; Meraney, Anoop; Sjoberg, Daniel; Bochner, Bernard; Dalbagni, Guido; Donat, Machele; Herr, Harry.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 196, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 1014-1020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, C, Weber, R, Patel, D, Lowrance, W, Mellis, A, Cookson, M, Lang, M, Barocas, D, Chang, S, Newberger, E, Montgomery, JS, Weizer, AZ, Lee, CT, Kava, B, Jackson, M, Meraney, A, Sjoberg, D, Bochner, B, Dalbagni, G, Donat, M & Herr, H 2016, 'A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor', Journal of Urology, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 1014-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151
Anderson, Christopher ; Weber, Ryan ; Patel, Darshan ; Lowrance, William ; Mellis, Adam ; Cookson, Michael ; Lang, Maximilian ; Barocas, Daniel ; Chang, Sam ; Newberger, Elizabeth ; Montgomery, Jeffrey S. ; Weizer, Alon Z. ; Lee, Cheryl T. ; Kava, Bruce ; Jackson, Max ; Meraney, Anoop ; Sjoberg, Daniel ; Bochner, Bernard ; Dalbagni, Guido ; Donat, Machele ; Herr, Harry. / A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor. In: Journal of Urology. 2016 ; Vol. 196, No. 4. pp. 1014-1020.
@article{77874601b6f343b0a2034189c2a1db77,
title = "A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor",
abstract = "Purpose Previous studies have demonstrated significant variation in recurrence rates after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, likely due to differences in surgical quality. We sought to create a framework to define, measure and improve the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using a surgical checklist. Materials and Methods We formed a multi-institutional group of urologists with expertise with bladder cancer and identified 10 critical items that should be performed during every high quality transurethral bladder tumor resection. We prospectively implemented a 10-item checklist into practice and reviewed the operative reports of such resections performed before and after implementation. Results at all institutions were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the overall change in the mean number of items documented. Results The operative notes for 325 transurethral bladder tumor resections during checklist use were compared to those for 428 performed before checklist implementation. Checklist use increased the mean number of items reported from 4.8 to 8.0 per resection, resulting in a mean increase of 3.3 items (95{\%} CI 1.9–4.7) on meta-analysis. With the checklist the percentage of reports that included all 10 items increased from 0.5{\%} to 27{\%} (p <0.0001). Surgeons who reported more checklist items tended to have a slightly higher proportion of biopsies containing muscle, although not at conventional significance (p = 0.062). Conclusions The use of a 10-item checklist during transurethral resection of bladder tumor improved the reporting of critical procedural elements. Although there was no clear impact on the inclusion of muscle in the specimen, checklist use may enhance surgeon attention to important aspects of the procedure and be a lever for quality improvement.",
keywords = "checklist, quality improvement, surgeons, urinary bladder neoplasms, urologic surgical procedures",
author = "Christopher Anderson and Ryan Weber and Darshan Patel and William Lowrance and Adam Mellis and Michael Cookson and Maximilian Lang and Daniel Barocas and Sam Chang and Elizabeth Newberger and Montgomery, {Jeffrey S.} and Weizer, {Alon Z.} and Lee, {Cheryl T.} and Bruce Kava and Max Jackson and Anoop Meraney and Daniel Sjoberg and Bernard Bochner and Guido Dalbagni and Machele Donat and Harry Herr",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
pages = "1014--1020",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A 10-Item Checklist Improves Reporting of Critical Procedural Elements during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

AU - Anderson, Christopher

AU - Weber, Ryan

AU - Patel, Darshan

AU - Lowrance, William

AU - Mellis, Adam

AU - Cookson, Michael

AU - Lang, Maximilian

AU - Barocas, Daniel

AU - Chang, Sam

AU - Newberger, Elizabeth

AU - Montgomery, Jeffrey S.

AU - Weizer, Alon Z.

AU - Lee, Cheryl T.

AU - Kava, Bruce

AU - Jackson, Max

AU - Meraney, Anoop

AU - Sjoberg, Daniel

AU - Bochner, Bernard

AU - Dalbagni, Guido

AU - Donat, Machele

AU - Herr, Harry

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Purpose Previous studies have demonstrated significant variation in recurrence rates after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, likely due to differences in surgical quality. We sought to create a framework to define, measure and improve the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using a surgical checklist. Materials and Methods We formed a multi-institutional group of urologists with expertise with bladder cancer and identified 10 critical items that should be performed during every high quality transurethral bladder tumor resection. We prospectively implemented a 10-item checklist into practice and reviewed the operative reports of such resections performed before and after implementation. Results at all institutions were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the overall change in the mean number of items documented. Results The operative notes for 325 transurethral bladder tumor resections during checklist use were compared to those for 428 performed before checklist implementation. Checklist use increased the mean number of items reported from 4.8 to 8.0 per resection, resulting in a mean increase of 3.3 items (95% CI 1.9–4.7) on meta-analysis. With the checklist the percentage of reports that included all 10 items increased from 0.5% to 27% (p <0.0001). Surgeons who reported more checklist items tended to have a slightly higher proportion of biopsies containing muscle, although not at conventional significance (p = 0.062). Conclusions The use of a 10-item checklist during transurethral resection of bladder tumor improved the reporting of critical procedural elements. Although there was no clear impact on the inclusion of muscle in the specimen, checklist use may enhance surgeon attention to important aspects of the procedure and be a lever for quality improvement.

AB - Purpose Previous studies have demonstrated significant variation in recurrence rates after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, likely due to differences in surgical quality. We sought to create a framework to define, measure and improve the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using a surgical checklist. Materials and Methods We formed a multi-institutional group of urologists with expertise with bladder cancer and identified 10 critical items that should be performed during every high quality transurethral bladder tumor resection. We prospectively implemented a 10-item checklist into practice and reviewed the operative reports of such resections performed before and after implementation. Results at all institutions were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the overall change in the mean number of items documented. Results The operative notes for 325 transurethral bladder tumor resections during checklist use were compared to those for 428 performed before checklist implementation. Checklist use increased the mean number of items reported from 4.8 to 8.0 per resection, resulting in a mean increase of 3.3 items (95% CI 1.9–4.7) on meta-analysis. With the checklist the percentage of reports that included all 10 items increased from 0.5% to 27% (p <0.0001). Surgeons who reported more checklist items tended to have a slightly higher proportion of biopsies containing muscle, although not at conventional significance (p = 0.062). Conclusions The use of a 10-item checklist during transurethral resection of bladder tumor improved the reporting of critical procedural elements. Although there was no clear impact on the inclusion of muscle in the specimen, checklist use may enhance surgeon attention to important aspects of the procedure and be a lever for quality improvement.

KW - checklist

KW - quality improvement

KW - surgeons

KW - urinary bladder neoplasms

KW - urologic surgical procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995906243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995906243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151

M3 - Article

C2 - 27044571

AN - SCOPUS:84995906243

VL - 196

SP - 1014

EP - 1020

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -