$29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? how presentation order affects package perceptions

Rajesh Bagchi, Derick Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When consumers consider a package (multi-item) price, which presentation order is more appealing, price first ($29 for 70 items) or item quantity first (70 items for $29)? Will this depend on package size (larger [70 items] vs. smaller [7 items]) or unit price calculation difficulty (higher [$29 for 70 items] vs. lower [$20 for 50 items])? Why? Three studies demonstrate how presentation order affects package evaluations and choice under different levels of package size and unit price calculation difficulty. The first piece of information becomes salient and affects evaluations when packages are larger and unit price calculations are difficult (i.e., price-item [item-price] makes price [items] salient, negatively [positively] affecting evaluations). These effects do not persist with smaller packages or easier unit price calculations. Our findings contribute to several literatures (e.g., numerosity, computational difficulty) but primarily to the order effects literature and have implications for measurement and practice (e.g., pricing).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-73
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

evaluation
pricing
Evaluation
literature
Computational
Numerosity
Salient
Salient Information
Pricing
Order effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

$29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? how presentation order affects package perceptions. / Bagchi, Rajesh; Davis, Derick.

In: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 39, No. 1, 06.2012, p. 62-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9dc64f2107b4196b3296282f5e2df78,
title = "$29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? how presentation order affects package perceptions",
abstract = "When consumers consider a package (multi-item) price, which presentation order is more appealing, price first ($29 for 70 items) or item quantity first (70 items for $29)? Will this depend on package size (larger [70 items] vs. smaller [7 items]) or unit price calculation difficulty (higher [$29 for 70 items] vs. lower [$20 for 50 items])? Why? Three studies demonstrate how presentation order affects package evaluations and choice under different levels of package size and unit price calculation difficulty. The first piece of information becomes salient and affects evaluations when packages are larger and unit price calculations are difficult (i.e., price-item [item-price] makes price [items] salient, negatively [positively] affecting evaluations). These effects do not persist with smaller packages or easier unit price calculations. Our findings contribute to several literatures (e.g., numerosity, computational difficulty) but primarily to the order effects literature and have implications for measurement and practice (e.g., pricing).",
author = "Rajesh Bagchi and Derick Davis",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1086/661893",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "62--73",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Research",
issn = "0093-5301",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? how presentation order affects package perceptions

AU - Bagchi, Rajesh

AU - Davis, Derick

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - When consumers consider a package (multi-item) price, which presentation order is more appealing, price first ($29 for 70 items) or item quantity first (70 items for $29)? Will this depend on package size (larger [70 items] vs. smaller [7 items]) or unit price calculation difficulty (higher [$29 for 70 items] vs. lower [$20 for 50 items])? Why? Three studies demonstrate how presentation order affects package evaluations and choice under different levels of package size and unit price calculation difficulty. The first piece of information becomes salient and affects evaluations when packages are larger and unit price calculations are difficult (i.e., price-item [item-price] makes price [items] salient, negatively [positively] affecting evaluations). These effects do not persist with smaller packages or easier unit price calculations. Our findings contribute to several literatures (e.g., numerosity, computational difficulty) but primarily to the order effects literature and have implications for measurement and practice (e.g., pricing).

AB - When consumers consider a package (multi-item) price, which presentation order is more appealing, price first ($29 for 70 items) or item quantity first (70 items for $29)? Will this depend on package size (larger [70 items] vs. smaller [7 items]) or unit price calculation difficulty (higher [$29 for 70 items] vs. lower [$20 for 50 items])? Why? Three studies demonstrate how presentation order affects package evaluations and choice under different levels of package size and unit price calculation difficulty. The first piece of information becomes salient and affects evaluations when packages are larger and unit price calculations are difficult (i.e., price-item [item-price] makes price [items] salient, negatively [positively] affecting evaluations). These effects do not persist with smaller packages or easier unit price calculations. Our findings contribute to several literatures (e.g., numerosity, computational difficulty) but primarily to the order effects literature and have implications for measurement and practice (e.g., pricing).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861743677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861743677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/661893

DO - 10.1086/661893

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861743677

VL - 39

SP - 62

EP - 73

JO - Journal of Consumer Research

JF - Journal of Consumer Research

SN - 0093-5301

IS - 1

ER -